Search blog.co.uk

Archives for: September 2006

What is A Psychopath?

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 26 Sep. 2006 - 23:40:09

The terms sociopath or psychopath often bring to mind images of sadistically violent individuals such as Ted Bundy or the fictional character of Dr. Hannibal "The Cannibal" Lecter in the book and movie The Silence of the Lambs. But I believe the defining characteristic traits of sociopaths actually cover a much broader spectrum of individuals than most of us would ever imagine. The sociopath is that truly self-absorbed individual with no conscience or feeling for others and for whom social rules have no meaning. I believe that most all of us know or have come in contact with sociopathic individuals without even knowing it. [Wendy Koenigsmann]

What is A Psychopath?
Psychopaths cannot be understood in terms of antisocial rearing or development. They are simply morally depraved individuals who represent the "monsters" in our society. They are unstoppable and untreatable predators whose violence is planned, purposeful and emotionless. The violence continues until it reaches a plateau at age 50 or so, then tapers off.

Their emotionlessness reflects a detached, fearless, and possibly dissociated state, revealing a low-state autonomic nervous system and lack of anxiety. It's difficult to say what motivates them - control and dominance possibly - since their life history will usually show no long-standing bonds with others nor much rhyme to their reason (other than the planning of violence).

They tend to operate with a grandiose demeanor, an attitude of entitlement, an insatiable appetite, and a tendency toward sadism. Fearlessness is probably the prototypical (core) characteristic (the low-fear hypothesis). It's helpful to think of them as high-speed vehicles with ineffective brakes.

Certain organic (brain) disorders and hormonal imbalances mimic the state of mind of a psychopath.

There are four (4) different subtypes of psychopaths. The oldest distinction was made by Cleckley back in 1941 between primary and secondary.

PRIMARY PSYCHOPATHS do not respond to punishment, apprehension, stress, or disapproval. They seem to be able to inhibit their antisocial impulses most of the time, not because of conscience, but because it suits their purpose at the time. Words do not seem to have the same meaning for them as they do for us. In fact, it's unclear if they even grasp the meaning of their own words, a condition that Cleckley called "semantic aphasia." They don't follow any life plan, and it seems as if they are incapable of experiencing any genuine emotion.

SECONDARY PSYCHOPATHS are risk-takers, but are also more likely to be stress-reactive, worriers, and guilt-prone. They expose themselves to more stress than the average person, but they are as vulnerable to stress as the average person. (This suggests that they are not "fully psychopathic." This may be due to distinctive genetic variations.)

They are daring, adventurous, unconventional people who began playing by their own rules early in life. They are strongly driven by a desire to escape or avoid pain, but are unable to resist temptation. As their anxiety increases toward some forbidden object, so does their attraction to it. They live their lives by the lure of temptation. Both primary and secondary psychopaths can be subdivided into:

DISTEMPERED PSYCHOPATHS are the kind that seem to fly into a rage or frenzy more easily and more often than other subtypes. Their frenzy will resemble an epileptic fit. They are also usually men with incredibly strong sex drives, capable of astonishing feats of sexual energy, and seemingly obsessed by sexual urges during a large part of their waking lives. Powerful cravings also seem to characterize them, as in drug addiction, kleptomania, pedophilia, any illicit or illegal indulgence. They like the endorphin "high" or "rush" off of excitement and risk-taking. The serial-rapist-murderer known as the Boston Strangler was such a psychopath.

CHARISMATIC PSYCHOPATHS are charming, attractive liars. They are usually gifted at some talent or another, and they use it to their advantage in manipulating others. They are usually fast-talkers, and possess an almost demonic ability to persuade others out of everything they own, even their lives. Leaders of religious sects or cults, for example, might be psychopaths if they lead their followers to their deaths. This subtype often comes to believe in their own fictions. They are irresistible.

Sociopaths have always existed in varying form and to various degrees. They have been known by various titles. They have been studied using various techniques, and through the years their ailment has been blamed on various causes. But one thing never varies: all sociopaths share three common characteristics. They are all very egocentric individuals with no empathy for others, and they are incapable of feeling remorse or guilt. [The Sociopath Rebecca Horton (April 1999)]

While the psychopath has likes and dislikes and fondness for the pleasures that human company can bring, analysis shows that he is completely egocentric, valuing others only for their enhancement of his own pleasure or status. While he gives no real love, he is quite capable of inspiring love of sometimes fanatical degree in others.

He is generally superficially charming and often makes a striking impression as possessed of the noblest of human qualities. He makes friends easily, and is very manipulative, using his ability with words to talk his way out of trouble. Many psychopaths love to be admired and bask in the adulation of others.

With the lack of love, there is also a lack of empathy. The psychopath is unable to feel sorry for others in unfortunate situations or put himself in another's place, whether or not they have been harmed by him.[Gordon Banks]


 
 

The Psychopathic Boss

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 25 Sep. 2006 - 23:15:16

I have a question for you all.
I would like to bet that a fair proportion of you out there have come across a psychopath in the form of your boss. You know what I mean, the guy who charms the women, gets them into his office under some false pretense and starts cosying up to them rubbing their arm in a 'friendly' way. Or the boss who has an ego as big as the Mersey Tunnel, who knows it all and insists on everything being done his way. There is an official name for them....Snakes in Suits. I love that analogy, it fits them so well. It is a fact that most of the bosses, Chief Executives, Vice Presidents of companies, Presidents of Countries are psychopaths. Think about it. They are ruthless and cunning and will walk all over people without disturbing a whisker on their chin in order to get to the top. Psychopaths always rise to the top. Sort of like the scum that rises to the top of the soup. Only then you can just scrape it off, unfortunately these psychos in high places take some budging. Apparently it is a fact that 6% of the population in the world are bona fide real deal psychopaths and the majority of those are men.
I am going to quote some passages from some of the most well known psyhcologists who studied psychopaths in the upcoming blogs. Names like Hervey Cleckley, Martha Stout, Robert Hare, who all have some really important insights into psyhcopaths and what makes them tick. Perhaps one day you might need this information - your very life might even depend on it. Stay tuned here for more.

The Psychopathic Boss

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 25 Sep. 2006 - 23:15:13

I have a question for you all.
I would like to bet that a fair proportion of you out there have come across a psychopath in the form of your boss. You know what I mean, the guy who charms the women, gets them into his office under some false pretense and starts cosying up to them rubbing their arm in a 'friendly' way. Or the boss who has an ego as big as the Mersey Tunnel, who knows it all and insists on everything being done his way. There is an official name for them....Snakes in Suits. I love that analogy, it fits them so well. It is a fact that most of the bosses, Chief Executives, Vice Presidents of companies, Presidents of Countries are psychopaths. Think about it. They are ruthless and cunning and will walk all over people without disturbing a whisker on their chin in order to get to the top. Psychopaths always rise to the top. Sort of like the scum that rises to the top of the soup. Only then you can just scrape it off, unfortunately these psychos in high places take some budging. Apparently it is a fact that 6% of the population in the world are bona fide real deal psychopaths and the majority of those are men.
I am going to quote some passages from some of the most well known psyhcologists who studied psychopaths in the upcoming blogs. Names like Hervey Cleckley, Martha Stout, Robert Hare, who all have some really important insights into psyhcopaths and what makes them tick. Perhaps one day you might need this information - your very life might even depend on it. Stay tuned here for more.

The Psychopathic Boss

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 25 Sep. 2006 - 23:15:12

I have a question for you all.
I would like to bet that a fair proportion of you out there have come across a psychopath in the form of your boss. You know what I mean, the guy who charms the women, gets them into his office under some false pretense and starts cosying up to them rubbing their arm in a 'friendly' way. Or the boss who has an ego as big as the Mersey Tunnel, who knows it all and insists on everything being done his way. There is an official name for them....Snakes in Suits. I love that analogy, it fits them so well. It is a fact that most of the bosses, Chief Executives, Vice Presidents of companies, Presidents of Countries are psychopaths. Think about it. They are ruthless and cunning and will walk all over people without disturbing a whisker on their chin in order to get to the top. Psychopaths always rise to the top. Sort of like the scum that rises to the top of the soup. Only then you can just scrape it off, unfortunately these psychos in high places take some budging. Apparently it is a fact that 6% of the population in the world are bona fide real deal psychopaths and the majority of those are men.
I am going to quote some passages from some of the most well known psyhcologists who studied psychopaths in the upcoming blogs. Names like Hervey Cleckley, Martha Stout, Robert Hare, who all have some really important insights into psyhcopaths and what makes them tick. Perhaps one day you might need this information - your very life might even depend on it. Stay tuned here for more.

The Psychopathic Boss

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 25 Sep. 2006 - 23:15:11

I have a question for you all.
I would like to bet that a fair proportion of you out there have come across a psychopath in the form of your boss. You know what I mean, the guy who charms the women, gets them into his office under some false pretense and starts cosying up to them rubbing their arm in a 'friendly' way. Or the boss who has an ego as big as the Mersey Tunnel, who knows it all and insists on everything being done his way. There is an official name for them....Snakes in Suits. I love that analogy, it fits them so well. It is a fact that most of the bosses, Chief Executives, Vice Presidents of companies, Presidents of Countries are psychopaths. Think about it. They are ruthless and cunning and will walk all over people without disturbing a whisker on their chin in order to get to the top. Psychopaths always rise to the top. Sort of like the scum that rises to the top of the soup. Only then you can just scrape it off, unfortunately these psychos in high places take some budging. Apparently it is a fact that 6% of the population in the world are bona fide real deal psychopaths and the majority of those are men.
I am going to quote some passages from some of the most well known psyhcologists who studied psychopaths in the upcoming blogs. Names like Hervey Cleckley, Martha Stout, Robert Hare, who all have some really important insights into psyhcopaths and what makes them tick. Perhaps one day you might need this information - your very life might even depend on it. Stay tuned here for more.

The Psychopathic Boss

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 25 Sep. 2006 - 23:15:10

I have a question for you all.
I would like to bet that a fair proportion of you out there have come across a psychopath in the form of your boss. You know what I mean, the guy who charms the women, gets them into his office under some false pretense and starts cosying up to them rubbing their arm in a 'friendly' way. Or the boss who has an ego as big as the Mersey Tunnel, who knows it all and insists on everything being done his way. There is an official name for them....Snakes in Suits. I love that analogy, it fits them so well. It is a fact that most of the bosses, Chief Executives, Vice Presidents of companies, Presidents of Countries are psychopaths. Think about it. They are ruthless and cunning and will walk all over people without disturbing a whisker on their chin in order to get to the top. Psychopaths always rise to the top. Sort of like the scum that rises to the top of the soup. Only then you can just scrape it off, unfortunately these psychos in high places take some budging. Apparently it is a fact that 6% of the population in the world are bona fide real deal psychopaths and the majority of those are men.
I am going to quote some passages from some of the most well known psyhcologists who studied psychopaths in the upcoming blogs. Names like Hervey Cleckley, Martha Stout, Robert Hare, who all have some really important insights into psyhcopaths and what makes them tick. Perhaps one day you might need this information - your very life might even depend on it. Stay tuned here for more.

The Psychopathic Boss

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 25 Sep. 2006 - 23:15:10

I have a question for you all.
I would like to bet that a fair proportion of you out there have come across a psychopath in the form of your boss. You know what I mean, the guy who charms the women, gets them into his office under some false pretense and starts cosying up to them rubbing their arm in a 'friendly' way. Or the boss who has an ego as big as the Mersey Tunnel, who knows it all and insists on everything being done his way. There is an official name for them....Snakes in Suits. I love that analogy, it fits them so well. It is a fact that most of the bosses, Chief Executives, Vice Presidents of companies, Presidents of Countries are psychopaths. Think about it. They are ruthless and cunning and will walk all over people without disturbing a whisker on their chin in order to get to the top. Psychopaths always rise to the top. Sort of like the scum that rises to the top of the soup. Only then you can just scrape it off, unfortunately these psychos in high places take some budging. Apparently it is a fact that 6% of the population in the world are bona fide real deal psychopaths and the majority of those are men.
I am going to quote some passages from some of the most well known psyhcologists who studied psychopaths in the upcoming blogs. Names like Hervey Cleckley, Martha Stout, Robert Hare, who all have some really important insights into psyhcopaths and what makes them tick. Perhaps one day you might need this information - your very life might even depend on it. Stay tuned here for more.

Prince Psychopath

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 13 Sep. 2006 - 01:01:24

PRINCE Vittorio Emanuele of Savoy, the gaffe-prone heir to the Italian throne, has compounded his troubles by admitting the manslaughter of a German man in 1978 and boasting that he "got off".

The prince is already under investigation on charges involving illegal gambling, prostitution and corruption, which he denies. He left Italy aged 9 when the monarchy was abolished after the Second World War because of its close links with Fascism and returned three years ago from exile in Switzerland on condition that he did not take part in politics or claim former royal palaces and the crown jewels.

He was arrested in June after a two year investigation and accused of using his influence to lubricate business deals involving illegal gambling machines and the procurement of Eastern European prostitutes.

He was remanded in custody and placed under house arrest. He is now free pending charges but not allowed to leave Italy. It has emerged that while in prison at Potenza in southern Italy his conversations with other detainees were bugged by investigating magistrates, including one in which he related in detail an incident in August 1978 off the island of Cavallo, near Corsica, when he boarded a yacht and shot Dirk Hamer, 19, who was sleeping on the deck of another yacht nearby.Herr Hamer died of his wounds in hospital five months later and Vittorio Emanuele was charged in Paris in October 1989 with manslaughter and possession of an offensive weapon.

He was acquitted of the fatal wounding in November 1991 and convicted only of unauthorised possession of a rifle.

At the trial, Vittorio Emanuele said that he boarded the boat because his yacht's rubber dinghy had been stolen, and fired in panic when passengers on the other yacht woke up. In his conversations in prison, however, the prince told a fellow inmate: "I was in the wrong, but I put one over on those French judges." He said sarcastically that the judges were "exceptional . . . they called twenty witnesses and the prosecution demanded five and a half years, but I was certain I would win".

PRINCE'S GAFFES

Vittorio Emanuele is the son of Umberto II, whose reign ended with the referendum of 1946 abolishing the monarchy

Two years ago he punched his cousin, the Duke of D'Aosta and a rival claimant to the throne, in the face at a dinner held by King Juan Carlos I of Spain

At the time of his arrest in June, Italian newspapers published wiretaps in which he instructed an associate to "give a good slapping" to a prostitute to whom he had given €500 Euros but who had failed to perform her duties satisfactorily.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2353054,00.html

Human or Something Else?

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 10 Sep. 2006 - 23:42:55

Human or Something Else?

http://signs-of-the-times.org

Human or Something Else?

There Is Still Time

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 10 Sep. 2006 - 23:36:52

There Is Still Time

http://signs-of-the-times.org

Psychopaths Rule Our World

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 10 Sep. 2006 - 23:32:19

Psychopaths Rule Our World

Pathocracry : Disease

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 09 Sep. 2006 - 21:59:43

I just found this amazing video on psychopaths. It's called Pathocracy: Disease.
It is definitley a must see video for all those humans needing to wake up about the other race 'psychopaths' Check it out here :

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/psychopaths.htm

Douglas Reed

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 08 Sep. 2006 - 16:28:58

Douglas Reed

I am so involved with this book Controversy of Zion written by Douglas Reed in 1953 that has recently been discovered and I really want to share with you all a bit more information:-

The Author: In Europe during the years immediately before and after World War II the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone's lips; his books were being sold by scores of thousand, and he was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of readers and admirers. Former London Times correspondent in Central Europe, he had won great fame with books like Insanity Fair, Disgrace Abounding, Lest We Regret, Somewhere South of Suez, Far and Wide and several others, each amplifying a hundredfold the scope available to him as one of the world's leading foreign correspondents.

The disappearance into almost total oblivion of Douglas Reed and all his works was a change that could not have been wrought by time alone; indeed, the correctness of his interpretation of the unfolding history of the times found some confirmation in what happened to him when at the height of his powers.

After 1951, with the publication of Far and Wide, in which he set the history of the United States of America into the context of all he had learned in Europe of the politics of the world, Reed found himself banished from the bookstands, all publishers' doors closed to him, and those books already published liable to be withdrawn from library shelves and "lost", never to be replaced.

His public career as a writer now apparently at an end, Reed was at last free to undertake a great task for which all that had gone before was but a kind of preparation and education that no university could provide and which only the fortunate and gifted few could fully use - his years as a foreign correspondent, his travels in Europe and America, his conversations and contacts with the great political leaders of his day, plus his eager absorption through reading and observation of all that was best in European culture.

Experiences which other men might have accepted as defeat, served only to focus Douglas Reed's powers on what was to be his most important undertaking - that of researching and retelling the story of the last 2000 years and more in such a way as to render intelligible much of modern history which for the masses remains in our time steeped in darkness and closely guarded by the terrors of an invisible system of censorship.

The Book: Commencing in 1951, Douglas Reed spent more than three years - much of this time separated from his wife and young family - working in the New York Central Library, or tapping away at his typewriter in spartan lodgings in New York or Montreal. With workmanlike zeal, the book was rewritten, all 300,000 words of it, and the Epilogue only added in 1956.

The story of the book itself - the unusual circumstances in which it was written, and how the manuscript, after having remained hidden for more than 20 years, came to light and was at last made available for publication - is part of the history of our century, throwing some light on a struggle of which the multitudes know nothing: that conducted relentlessly and unceasingly on the battleground of the human mind.

It needed some unusual source of spiritual power and motivation to bring to completion so big a book involving so much laborious research and cross-checking, a book, moreover, which seemed to have little or no chance of being published in the author's lifetime.

Although there is correspondence to show that the title was briefly discussed with one publisher, the manuscript was never submitted but remained for 22 years stowed away in three zippered files on top of a wardrobe in Reed's home in Durban, South Africa.

Relaxed and at peace with himself in the knowledge that he had carried his great enterprise as far as was possible in the circumstances of the times, Douglas Reed patiently accepted his forced retirement as journalist and writer, put behind him all that belonged to the past and adjusted himself cheerfully to a different mode of existence, in which most of his new-found friends and acquaintances, charmed by his lively mind and rich sense of humour, remained for years wholly unaware that this was indeed the Douglas Reed of literary fame.

Of this he was sure, whether or not it would happen in his lifetime, there would come a time when circumstances would permit, and the means be found, to communicate to the world his message of history rewritten, and the central message of Christianity restated.Interpretation: For the rest, The Controversy of Zion, can be left to speak for itself; indeed, it is a work of revisionist history and religious exposition the central message of which is revealed in almost every page, understanding and compassionate of people but severely critical of the inordinate and dangerous ambitions of their leaders.

In the final chapter, under the heading the Climacteric, Douglas Reed remarks that if he could have planned it all when he began writing his book in 1949, he could not have chosen a better moment than the last months of 1956 to review the long history of Talmudic Zionism and re-examine it against the background of what was still happening on the stage of world politics.

For 1956 was the year of another American presidential election in which, once again, the Zionists demonstrated their decisive power to influence Western politics; it was the year in which the nations of the West stood by as helpless spectators as Soviet forces were used to crush a spontaneous revolt and re-install a Jewish-Communist regime in Hungary; and it was the year in which Britain and France, under Zionist pressure, were drawn into the disastrous fiasco of an attempt to capture the Suez Canal, an adventure from which, once again, Israel alone gained any advantage.

Everything that has happened since Reed wrote those last sentences in 1956 has continued to endorse the correctness of his interpretation of more than 2000 years of troubled history.

The Middle East has remained an area of intense political activity and of the maximum falsification of news and suppression of genuine debate, and it was only the few with some knowledge of the role of Talmudic Zionism and Communism who could have had any chance of solving the problem of successive events of major importance, like the so-called Six Day War in 1967 and the massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982.

Those who have read The Controversy of Zion will not be surprised to learn that there were clear signs of collusion between the Soviet Union and Israel in precipitating the Israeli attack on Egypt, for it was only because Colonel Nasser had been warned by the Kremlin bosses that Israel was about to attack Egypt's ally Syria that he moved nearly all his armed forces to his country' s northern border, where they fell an easy prey to Israel's vastly superior army.

It seemed as if nothing had changed when in 1982 Israel launched a massive and most ruthless attack on Southern Lebanon, ostensibly for the purpose of rooting out the Palestine Liberation Organisation, but actually in furtherance of an expansionist policy about which Jewish leaders have always been remarkably frank.

By this time, however, the pro-Zionist mythology generated by Western politicians and media in which Israel was always represented as a tiny and virtuous nation in constant need of help and protection, was obviously beginning to lose much of its plausibility, so that few were surprised when the British Institute of Strategic Studies announced that Israel could now be regarded as fourth in the world as a military power, after the USA, the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China - well ahead of nations like Britain and France.

More deeply significant was the reaction of the Jewish people, both in Israel and abroad, to an apparent triumph of Zionist arms in Lebanon. While Western politicians and media remained timorously restrained in their comment, even after news of the massacre of an estimated 1500 men, women and children in two Beirut refugee camps, 350,000 of the residents of Tel Aviv staged a public demonstration against their government and there were reports in the Jewish press that controversy over the Lebanese war had rocked the Israel army and affected all ranks.

Of this, too, Douglas Reed seems to have had some presentiment, for among the last words in his book are these: "I believe the Jews of the world are equally beginning to see the error of revolutionary Zionism, the twin of the other destructive movement, and, as this century ends, will at last decide to seek involvement in common mankind" .

Beginning of the End

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 08 Sep. 2006 - 02:43:45

Mr Psychopath

Today I had an opportunity to learn about a very specific type of person, or to be exact, a scientist, that probably will be (or maybe is) proud to be a part of a project that will likely result in the death of thousands, if not millions of people.

A psychopath? Probably. He also reminded me of another charming fellow (Pianka) who advised the unleashing of the Ebola virus to wipe out 90% of humanity. http://cryptogon.com/2006_04_02_blogarchive.html#114406106840496692

I am talking here about Ido Kanter. See here for his bio. http://www.ph.biu.ac.il/fac.php?name=kanter

Yesterday, Kanter wrote an article http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3299324,00.html

on the Israeli news site 'Ynet News' about an urgent need to "revaluate a known equation of warfare." The article is in Hebrew, which means that it conveniently beyond the purview of most people, unless somone were to translate the important points, which I will now do.

According to Kanter, in our (Israel's) current situation we have to revaluate the "known equation" of military response. The known equation is: if the country is being attacked with conventional weapons, the response should be using conventional weapons, but if the attack is using unconventional weapons (nuclear, chemical) the response should or might be to use the same means. However, according to Kanter's sick point of view, Israel should revaluate this approach and understand that maybe now it is too late for conventional responses, in fact - he asserts that the conventional response simply won't do any good anymore. Nukes are the new best friend of Israel.

The Israel military and government, Kanter claims, should understand that while we face 'danger' from Iran, Israel's nuclear capability (some 200 bombs) is the best option, and the Israeli government should prepare the ground for national acceptance of a "Nuke them first" stance.

Later, Kanger offers some cold and oh-so-smart calculations (remember, his expertise is cold scientific calculations and 'game theory') that even if the world (or just Israel) is still not ready for such a change in approach, it's really not so hard to accept. As Kanter says, sometimes a thousand heavy conventional missiles can often do more damage than from one little nuclear bomb. To people like Kanter, the Israeli government and the fascists in the White House, it's just a matter of perspective and problem formulation/solution.

Yes, Kanter, like his friends in the Israeli government, is probably a psychopath or simply insane. The problem however is that, if the replies to his article are anything to go by, he is not alone in his depraved theorizing. The reality is that there really are some very sick people in positions of almost absolute power, and it appears that they wait only for the 'glorious' opportunity to go down in flames, taking their subjects with them. But maybe to them it's not a case of going down in flames but rather 'up'? I suppose it's a matter of perspective, isn't it?

GAZA'S DARKNESS

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 05 Sep. 2006 - 23:45:21

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060904_Gaza27sdarkness.php

Gaza's darkness
By Gideon Levy

04/09/2006

Gaza has been reoccupied. The world must know this and Israelis must know it, too. It is in its worst condition, ever. Since the abduction of Gilad Shalit, and more so since the outbreak of the Lebanon war, the Israel Defense Forces has been rampaging through Gaza - there's no other word to describe it - killing and demolishing, bombing and shelling, indiscriminately.

Nobody thinks about setting up a commission of inquiry; the issue isn't even on the agenda. Nobody asks why it is being done and who decided to do it. But under the cover of the darkness of the Lebanon war, the IDF returned to its old practices in Gaza as if there had been no disengagement. So it must be said forthrightly, the disengagement is dead. Aside from the settlements that remain piles of rubble, nothing is left of the disengagement and its promises. How contemptible all the sublime and nonsensical talk about "the end of the occupation" and "partitioning the land" now appears. Gaza is occupied, and with greater brutality than before. The fact that it is more convenient for the occupier to control it from outside has nothing to do with the intolerable living conditions of the occupied.

In large parts of Gaza nowadays, there is no electricity. Israel bombed the only power station in Gaza, and more than half the electricity supply will be cut off for at least another year. There's hardly any water. Since there is no electricity, supplying homes with water is nearly impossible. Gaza is filthier and smellier than ever: Because of the embargo Israel and the world have imposed on the elected authority, no salaries are being paid and the street cleaners have been on strike for the past few weeks. Piles of garbage and obnoxious clouds of stink strangle the coastal strip, turning it into Calcutta.

Please everyone go here to read more, everyone needs to know the Real Truth!

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060904_Gaza27sdarkness.php

US,ISRAELI ARMIES PLAN ETHNIC CLEANSING OF MIDDLE EAST

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 05 Sep. 2006 - 23:31:36

By Nafeez Mosaddq Ahmed

September 1, 2006

In a little-noted article printed in early August in the Armed Forces Journal, a monthly magazine for officers and leaders in the United States military community, early retired Major Ralph Peters sets out the latest ideas in current US strategic thinking. And they are extremely disturbing.

Ethnically Cleansing the Entire Middle East

Maj. Peters, formerly assigned to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence where he was responsible for future warfare, candidly outlines how the map of the Middle East should be fundamentally re-drawn, in a new imperial endeavor designed to correct past errors. "Without such major boundary revisions, we shall never see a more peaceful Middle East," he observes, but then adds wryly: "Oh, and one other dirty little secret from 5,000 years of history: Ethnic cleansing works."

Read more here : http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060904_USIsraeliArmiesPlanEthnicCleansingOfMiddleEast.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is the author of The London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry. He teaches courses in International Relations at the School of Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, where he is doing his PhD studying imperialism and genocide. Since 9/11, he has authored three other books revealing the realpolitik behind the rhetoric of the War on Terror: The War on Freedom, Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq and The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation and the Anatomy of Terrorism. In summer 2005, he testified as an expert witness in US Congress about his research on international terrorism

CONTROVERSY OF ZION

by beware_of_the_psychopaths @ 05 Sep. 2006 - 23:01:59

Zion

I was recently introduced to a book that has been lain in dust for more than 50 years. It is a nugget of gold. I can' believe my luck in being introduced to this book! Okay okay I can hear everyone clammering to know the books title. It is called the Controversy of Zion and was written by Douglas Reed. Now strangely enough this name rings a bell with me. He wrote the book in 1953, actually he started writing it in 1953 and it took him 3 years to complete. I vaguely remember the name and he was a very popular and well known journalist for the Times newspaper of London. I think he has died now. But anyway he was banned and ostricised by the publishing and media community after writing his previous book Far and Wide. He must have known that the public at large would not get to read his latest book Controversy of Zion as all publshing doors had been closed to him, nevertheless he spent 3 relentless painstakingly and meticulously researching the content in the British Library in London and in my opinion he produced a masterpiece! I cannot rate this book too highly, I absolutely love it! It is rivettting reading and I cant put it down.
If you want to have a taste of it yourself you can read the preface here :-

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/forum/viewtopic.php?id=3026

To learn about the book and critical comments about it - search Google for ""knud eriksen""

Good Reading and let me know if you delve into it further, I would love to have your comments.


 
 

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.